
To perform at a good level one needs to be able to recover well from a set backs. This is true on a move, game and tournament level. I believe that not recovering well psychologically was my downfall in the event.
In the first round I had this position as White. Instead of taking the pawn I played 27.
Bg4 first, which throws away the advantage, since Black just plays Rh8 and defends the h-pawn. After the rooks come off I may still have a better position, but I some how manage to
lose the game.

I think I did a fare job recovering after the first round loss and was determined to win the next 4 games. After wins in the 2
nd and 3rd rounds. I had the following position as Black with the move. I was very happy with this position and was sure I could convert it to a win, but only managed to draw. I could not get my self to recover from yet another set back as now there was no way for me to go 4-1. I should have probably not played the last round. What
ai missed was the after the exchanges .
..Bxd3,Nxd4 Qc7, Qxc7 Rxc7, White can play
Rc1 because of White's back rank issues. It was clearly a case of stopping the analysis one move too early. There was no reason to exchange at this stage. I could have simply improved my position and then infiltrate the Q-side.
In the 5
th round I was paired against fellow blogger
Greg. After misplaying the opening I got an inferior position as White and to make matters worse also got myself in time trouble. Trying to make time control I repeated the position and should have just taken the draw, but I wanted to reach time control to see if there was any way out of the bad situation, but in the last move before time control I dropped my queen to a knight fork, later analysis shows that it would have been hard for me to hold this game.
It sounds odd, but I am more
dissapointed about drawing the 3rd round game than losing the 1st and 5
th.
I did bad a job recovering from bad moves and bad games, I just have to do a good job recovering from a bad tournament!